Ryan Quinn
Ryan Quinn reports on how political power, public funding and regulation are reshaping colleges and universities, with a beat that centers on state policy, federal research policy and the conditions under which faculty and students work and speak.
How GOP state lawmakers are reshaping general education
Quinn devotes sustained coverage to Republican-controlled legislatures that are rewriting what students must learn to graduate, focusing on mandatory civics and U.S. history requirements anchored in founding documents.
His reporting on general education laws traces how measures like Ohio’s Senate Bill 1 and similar statutes require new “American civic literacy” courses and narrow the core curriculum in the name of viewpoint diversity and patriotism. He connects these bills to a broader pattern of anti-faculty legislation, documenting how red states vie to impose the most sweeping controls over campuses and shared governance. Articles on conservative-backed “civic centers” and new state-funded institutes show him following not just the laws themselves but the institutional experiments they trigger, including advisory councils resigning after calls for a “reset” and concerns about ideological missions.
Across this work he relies on interviews with lawmakers, faculty and advocacy groups to show how statutory language translates into changed courses, altered power balances and contested visions of democracy in higher education.
Federal research funding, grants and regulation
Quinn also follows federal research and grantmaking closely, treating agencies’ timelines and rule changes as core higher education stories.
In coverage of National Science Foundation funding delays, he tracks grant counts and dollar obligations over multiple fiscal years, highlighting billions in unawarded money and court-ordered updates on the Education Department’s Institute of Education Sciences. His reporting on the Education Department’s proposal to allow more grant terminations examines provisions that would let the secretary cancel awards “for convenience,” reshape indirect cost rules and tie grants more tightly to presidential executive orders, alongside thousands of critical public comments from higher ed groups.
Quinn’s articles on National Institutes of Health initiatives, such as a multiyear program to support replicability and reproducibility research, show him situating new funding streams within debates over scientific rigor and the tools researchers use to link related publications. He covers targeted reallocations as well, including federal decisions to redirect hundreds of millions in Minority-Serving Institution funds to historically Black colleges and universities and tribal colleges, emphasizing what those shifts mean for campuses that have long faced resource gaps.
This strand of his beat presents federal agencies and their regulatory power as central actors in academic life, not just distant budget offices.
The heated discourse about civil discourse
Quinn writes repeatedly about the growing industry around “civil discourse,” bridge-building and viewpoint diversity, and the backlash those efforts draw from scholars and activists. In pieces on the “heated discourse about civil discourse,” he profiles organizations that promote dialogue across differences and the critics who argue these projects can mute protest and favor centrist or conservative agendas. His reporting on the Uncivil consortium details dossiers and reports that scrutinize the funders behind civility initiatives, including claims that major backers also invest heavily in conservative and pro-Israel causes and that the real goal is to silence dissent and student organizing. Quinn’s deeper look at “viewpoint diversity” tracks how empowered Republicans use legislation and funding threats to demand more right-leaning representation on campus, framing these moves within long-standing arguments that universities lack conservative perspectives.
Beyond U.S. policy debates, his bylines for an international higher education magazine extend this focus to academic freedom flashpoints, covering professors investigated or disciplined over anti-Trump lecture comments, social media posts about an assassination attempt and remarks on Israel-Gaza, as well as a broader “chilling effect” on misinformation research.
He frequently returns to recording and surveillance in the classroom, writing about instructors who vow to fail students for surreptitious recording and cases where lectures are captured without a professor’s knowledge during conduct reviews. These stories collectively map the contested boundaries of acceptable speech, protest and pedagogy in contemporary higher education.
Shared governance, faculty conditions and campus discipline
Quinn’s earlier focus on faculty issues and his current policy beat converge in coverage of tenure, unions, layoffs and governance fights.
He has reported on universities testing little-used tenure laws through layoffs, examining how statutes enacted years earlier suddenly become tools for reshaping faculty ranks and closing colleges. Articles on state legislation that threatens faculty unions analyze new membership and funding conditions, showing direct impacts on bargaining units and job security.
In pieces asking whether academics are leaving conservative states, he documents both the desire to exit politically fraught environments and the practical barriers of relocation and job markets, framing mobility as constrained even when discontent is high. Quinn frequently covers campus discipline and protest as policy stories, such as legislation in California that would have required a large public system to report on protester discipline, the governor’s veto of that bill, and separate measures on colleges hiring undocumented students. He follows how trustees, boards and system leaders exercise authority in these contexts, including situations where a trustee says he was not shown a president’s new contract, raising questions about transparency and shared governance at a major institution.
His reporting on contested legal education programs and decisions not to seek accreditation shows how nontraditional initiatives intersect with regulatory expectations and faculty concerns. Across these pieces he treats faculty advisers, councils, unions and trustees as key sources, using their accounts to illustrate how policy choices filter down into job security, disciplinary records and the everyday practice of shared governance.
Beat evolution and reporting style
Within the masthead, Quinn has moved from covering faculty, graduate students and academic freedom to a broader policy role that encompasses state legislation and federal research policy. His social media and professional profile descriptions underscore that he now reports on state government and federal research policy while drawing on experience as a K-12 and higher education reporter at a regional newspaper.
Across beats, he favors reported news and deep-dive formats over opinion, with pieces ranging from quick takes on vetoed bills to multi-sourced features dissecting complex legislative packages and funding programs. He consistently foregrounds the voices of those affected - faculty members facing discipline, students protesting cuts, union leaders navigating hostile laws, and policy advocates contesting rule changes - rather than centering his own perspective.
For story ideas that touch state legislation, federal research funding, campus speech, academic freedom or the mechanics of shared governance, his record shows a reporter who follows both the text of policy and the lived consequences on campuses.
4 more education journalists.
Abdul Latif Jameel
Abdul Latif Jameel publishes long-form, research-led pieces on how emerging technologies and scientific advances reshape education, industry, and society. He writes for the Abdul Latif Jameel masthead at the intersection of learning, innovation, and applied science, with a focus on technology, skills, and the future of learning. He explains complex fields such as quantum sensing in clear, accessible terms, breaking down frontier science and tying it to real-world applications. His coverage links breakthroughs in sensing, data, and automation to training, curriculum, and lifelong learning. He treats education as an applied system connected to industry, policy, infrastructure, and human development. He reports in an analytical, explanatory style, using research, pilots, and large-scale initiatives to examine how technologies are implemented, evaluated, and scaled in learning and training environments.
Abril Preciado
Abril Preciado is an Emmy award-winning bilingual television journalist at FOX6 News Milwaukee who focuses on education, school crises and policy decisions affecting students, families and staff. She follows school communities over months, from emergency response through investigations, relocation plans and the first day back in class. Her reporting on the Lincoln Avenue School fire covers displacement, safety changes, rebuilding and the move to temporary space. She also uses public records to examine local officials, test official claims and connect government conduct to public trust. Before joining FOX6, she reported for Univision in Sacramento, covering the Farm Workers March, wildfires, politics and the Latino community, and contributed border reporting for a national radio network. She centers families, explains complex decisions clearly and focuses on the human effects of policy.
Adria Iraheta
Adria Iraheta is a community-focused reporter at Denver7, distinct for centering students, families and residents in every story about schools, neighborhoods and public services. She covers how decisions by school districts, local agencies and public institutions land in daily life, with a particular focus on Aurora and Arapahoe County. Her beat sits at the intersection of education, community issues, public services, safety, infrastructure, health and climate, from job cuts in a school district to a new transit safety app, DMV outages, street changes and record heat waves. With a decade of local television reporting experience, she reports on the ground in specific local scenes, using plain language, direct questions to officials and clear explanations to show how policies, programs and changes affect the people who live, study and work in Colorado communities.
Alan J. Borsuk
Alan J. Borsuk stands out for connecting what happens in schools to the policy and political decisions behind them. He writes in-depth K-12 education analysis for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and serves as a senior fellow in law and public policy at Marquette University Law School. His work focuses on Milwaukee Public Schools, school choice, literacy, teacher pipelines, and school accountability. He uses long-range perspective, detailed reporting, and structured analysis to explain how reforms unfold, why they stall, and what they mean for students and leaders. He has also written on vouchers, Teach for America, discipline, and teacher evaluation, drawing on decades as a reporter and editor on education and public policy.