Jeremy Barr
Jeremy Barr covers how media institutions wield and respond to political power, focusing on clashes between newsrooms, corporate leadership and partisan politics for the Guardian US.
Media power and newsroom conflicts
Barr’s current beat centres on the ways political and corporate pressure shape editorial decisions inside major news organisations. His reporting on the “60 Minutes” correspondent Sharyn Alfonsi examines how CBS News declined to renew her contract after a disputed segment on a brutal Salvadoran prison, highlighting her argument that the non-renewal was a form of punishment for resisting political interference. In that coverage he gives weight to the internal mechanics of the dispute - the pulled CECOT story, the role of top editors, and the chilling effect she says the episode has on the newsroom - while keeping the focus on what the episode signals about editorial independence. The through-line is the power struggle inside institutions that are supposed to hold others to account.
Across this strand of work Barr is drawn to moments when journalists themselves become the story because of how their employers handle controversial reporting.
He traces how contract decisions, delayed broadcasts and executive silence can function as tools of control, rather than routine personnel matters. He writes in a straightforward, sourced style that foregrounds documents, prepared statements and interviews, allowing readers to see how institutional messaging shifts as pressure builds.
His emphasis is less on personalities and more on the systems that enable or constrain aggressive reporting on politically sensitive subjects.
Media, Trump and the optics of press power
Barr extends this focus on power to the relationship between journalists and political actors, particularly in the Trump era. In public commentary he has raised questions about whether high-profile rituals such as the White House Correspondents’ Dinner send the right signal at a time when Trump is openly threatening to jail journalists. That line of questioning reflects a consistent interest in how the press presents itself while covering political figures who attack its legitimacy.
He pays attention to the optics and symbolism around journalism - who attends marquee events, how they are framed, and what those choices communicate about the profession’s distance from or proximity to power.
His work often sits at the intersection of media criticism and political reporting, examining how coverage decisions influence the broader information environment rather than treating media as a closed industry story. Barr’s framing tends to connect individual controversies to the larger question of whether news organisations are reinforcing or resisting the narratives pushed by political campaigns and administrations.
He zeroes in on how those narratives play out on television and in high-visibility formats, where the stakes for both politicians and journalists are highest.
Press freedom, accountability and industry norms
Even when he is writing about employment decisions or programming choices, Barr’s underlying concern is press freedom and accountability inside newsrooms. His coverage of Alfonsi’s exit from “60 Minutes” dwells on her claim that the episode “sends a chilling message to the entire newsroom,” treating that assertion as a core fact to interrogate rather than a throwaway quote. He is attuned to the way disciplinary actions, non-renewals and public statements can deter reporters from tackling politically fraught subjects in the future.
In this way, his media stories double as reporting on the health of democratic oversight.
Barr also pays attention to industry norms and how they evolve in response to political pressure. He tracks debates over whether traditional events, formats and hierarchies still serve a press corps facing new kinds of threats from elected officials and online campaigns. His work highlights the internal conversations among journalists about risk, solidarity and visibility, showing how those discussions shape what ultimately appears on air or in print. The tone is measured and reportorial, but the choice of subjects makes clear that he sees newsroom governance as a public-interest issue, not just an internal HR matter.
Career on the media beat
Barr brings a long-running media beat to the Guardian, informed by years covering the business and politics of news for a major national newspaper and leading entertainment and advertising publications. He has reported on media from trade outlets through to national mastheads, building familiarity with both the inside-baseball dynamics of the industry and its public-facing role in political life.
That career path gives him a wide lens on how decisions made in boardrooms and control rooms ripple outward into electoral politics, public opinion and trust in institutions.
Across these stops he has stayed close to stories about cable networks, legacy broadcasters, digital upstarts and the regulatory and commercial pressures they face.
His coverage balances personnel moves and business shifts with attention to editorial choices, showing how staffing decisions, leadership changes and programming strategies connect to questions about truthfulness and accountability. For political stories that hinge on how information is mediated to the public, Barr approaches the subject as someone who has watched the media ecosystem reshape itself over more than a decade and now focuses that experience on the nexus of media and power at the Guardian.
4 more politics journalists.
A.D. Quig
A.D. Quig follows money and power through Chicago and Cook County government, showing how political decisions, taxes and public spending affect residents and businesses. At the Chicago Tribune, she covers city and county politics, municipal finance, tax policy, budgets and the structures shaping mayoral and council authority. She joined the Tribune in 2022 after covering politics for Crain’s Chicago Business and The Daily Line. Her work examines council power, ethics rules, police leadership, tax incentives, public agencies and pandemic aid. She has reported on data center tax breaks, property tax errors, federal relief spending and the fiscal effects of major development proposals. Quig combines insider government reporting with public accountability journalism. She uses public records, data and budget documents, follows committees and staff negotiations, and explains complex decisions in plain language with precise numbers and a direct link to everyday consequences.
Adam Daly
Adam Daly covers politics for amNewYork with a focus on the inner workings of city and state government and the low-profile forums where power is exercised and negotiated. He reports on commissions and panels that shape how New York is governed, treating charter reform and government efficiency as central political terrain. His coverage of moves to replace an Adams-era charter commission with a new government efficiency panel foregrounds mandate, authority, and what “efficiency” means in practice for agencies and services. He tracks who gains and loses influence when one commission supplants another and which constituencies are being answered to. Daly explains dense procedural questions in clear, reader-facing terms, using specific institutional details and occasional wordplay to connect jargon-heavy reforms to public spending, service delivery, and mayoral power.
Adam Pack
Adam Pack covers Capitol Hill through power struggles, investigations and ideological fights, focusing on how Congress intersects with Donald Trump’s agenda. He is a politics writer on Fox News Digital’s Capitol Hill team, covering Congress, federal elections, legislative battles, election rules, war powers, primaries and intraparty fights. He previously wrote for the Daily Caller News Foundation. His reporting examines deadlines, vote counts, bill language, campaign spending, court rulings, oversight reports, culture clashes and emerging issues such as AI-backed political groups. He has covered FISA reauthorization, defense spending, the SAVE America Act, housing policy, redistricting, candidate absences, primary spending and disputes over sex, gender, religion and race-based caucuses. He reports primarily through news features and investigative-style pieces built around documents, committee reports, court records, unearthed video and specific legislative details. He often co-writes complex Capitol Hill stories and publishes “FIRST ON FOX” exclusives.
Adam Sullivan
Adam Sullivan is a veteran politics reporter for WCAX who connects elections and party disputes to everyday life. He covers statewide races, party primaries, federal representation, political rhetoric, extremism, and accountability across the Upper Valley and neighboring states. His reporting includes Becca Balint’s victory over Molly Gray in the Democratic U.S. House primary to replace Congressman Peter Welch. He also reports when political controversies affect public safety, political culture, towns, and institutions, including a New Hampshire Libertarian Party post endorsing violence against elected Democrats. Sullivan follows cultural stories with civic consequences, such as Noah Kahan’s appeal to fans to stop stealing a Strafford road sign linked to his music. He writes straight news centered on concrete events, official reactions, political context, community impact, and what comes next.