Peter Mazereeuw is executive editor at The Hill Times, Canada’s premier outlet for parliamentary news. With over a decade of experience, he specializes in legislative processes, Senate governance, and the intersection of philanthropy with policy.
For nuanced pitches that align with Mazereeuw’s beat, emphasize cross-sector impacts and data-supported narratives. His work remains essential reading for understanding Canada’s governance infrastructure.
We’ve followed Peter Mazereeuw’s career as a cornerstone of Canadian political journalism, where his incisive analysis and editorial leadership at The Hill Times have shaped coverage of Parliament Hill since 2012. Mazereeuw’s work bridges policy, governance, and philanthropy, offering readers a nuanced lens into the mechanics of power.
Mazereeuw joined The Hill Times in 2012, initially covering legislative debates and Senate proceedings. His early work focused on dissecting complex bills, such as trade agreements and environmental policies, earning recognition for clarity in explaining bureaucratic processes. By 2018, he transitioned to editing roles, overseeing the daily newsletter Politics This Morning, which distills key political developments for subscribers. In 2023, he ascended to executive editor, spearheading the outlet’s podcast The Hot Room, a weekly deep dive into policy debates and interviews with lawmakers.
This April 2025 analysis examines Mark Carney’s leadership of the Liberal Party amid fluctuating poll numbers. Mazereeuw contrasts Carney’s economic credentials with voter skepticism over policy continuity, drawing on interviews with strategists and historical voting patterns. The piece underscores his ability to contextualize electoral dynamics within broader fiscal and social trends, making it a primer for understanding Canada’s 2025 political landscape.
Published in March 2025, this article critiques proposed Senate reforms aimed at increasing transparency. Mazereeuw highlights tensions between partisan appointments and procedural efficiency, using case studies from recent sessions. His sourcing—including anonymous quotes from staffers—reveals the logistical challenges of modernizing archaic parliamentary systems.
A February 2025 investigation into how philanthropic organizations influence policy, this piece maps lobbying efforts by major charities. Mazereeuw traces funding flows between nonprofits and political action committees, emphasizing regulatory gaps. The article exemplifies his knack for connecting niche beats (philanthropy) to wider governance issues.
Mazereeuw prioritizes stories where philanthropy, legislation, and governance overlap. For example, a pitch about a charity’s role in drafting climate legislation would align with his coverage of lobbying trends. Avoid siloed topics—he seeks narratives that reveal systemic connections.
His analysis of Senate reforms relied on quantitative metrics (e.g., voting records, bill passage rates). PR professionals should provide datasets or visualizations showing how policies impact communities, ensuring relevance to his evidence-based approach.
Mazereeuw often explores procedural nuances, such as committee negotiations or private members’ bills. Pitches about overlooked legislative mechanisms, especially those affecting philanthropy or media regulation, will resonate.
While he interviews senior leaders, Mazereeuw equally values insights from parliamentary secretaries or NGO program directors. These voices provide granular perspectives that enrich his stories.
His work maintains a nonpartisan tone, focusing on institutional dynamics rather than party politics. Pitches should emphasize bipartisan solutions or structural reforms over ideological endorsements.
At PressContact, we aim to help you discover the most relevant journalists for your PR efforts. If you're looking to pitch to more journalists who write on Politics, here are some other real estate journalist profiles you may find relevant:
