Peter Howell

Peter Howell: A Career Defined by Cinematic Insight

Peter Howell has shaped Canadian film criticism for nearly three decades as the lead movie critic for The Toronto Star. His work combines sharp analysis with a deep appreciation for storytelling, making him a trusted voice for readers and industry professionals alike. We explore his career trajectory, seminal articles, and how to craft pitches that align with his editorial focus.

Career Trajectory: From Pop Culture to Film Authority

Howell began his journalism career in 1976, initially covering pop culture before transitioning to film criticism in 1996. His early work focused on indie films and emerging directors, but his scope expanded to include blockbusters, international cinema, and film festival coverage. Key milestones include:

• 1996–2005: Established his critique style, emphasizing narrative depth and character development.
• 2006–2015: Authored Movies I Can’t Live Without (2014), blending memoir with film analysis.
• 2016–Present: Regular coverage of TIFF and Cannes, with a focus on sociopolitical themes in cinema.

Key Articles and Impact

• Gary Oldman, playing a real-life literary lion... (The Toronto Star, 2025) Howell dissects Paolo Sorrentino’s exploration of beauty and legacy through Gary Oldman’s portrayal of a fading author. The review highlights Sorrentino’s visual symbolism and Oldman’s nuanced performance, arguing that the film challenges viewers to confront artistic mortality. Howell’s analysis draws parallels between the protagonist’s journey and broader industry shifts, cementing his reputation for linking individual films to cultural trends.
• Mel Gibson directs Mark Wahlberg in ‘Flight Risk’... (The Toronto Star, 2025) This scathing critique of Gibson’s thriller questions the director’s ability to handle intimate dramas. Howell contrasts Wahlberg’s constrained performance with Gibson’s preference for grand narratives, noting the film’s tonal inconsistencies. The article sparked debate about A-list actors’ creative choices in mid-budget projects.
• ‘Wicked’ is an energetic delight... (The Toronto Star, 2024) Howell praises Jon M. Chu’s adaptation for revitalizing musical cinema through Ariana Grande’s vocal range and inventive set design. The review underscores the film’s cultural impact, particularly its appeal to Gen Z audiences, while acknowledging its deviations from the Broadway original.

Beat Analysis and Pitching Recommendations

Focus on Directorial Vision Over Star Power

Howell prioritizes filmmakers’ storytelling techniques, as seen in his Sorrentino analysis. Pitches should highlight unique directorial approaches or behind-the-scenes creative decisions rather than relying solely on A-list actor angles.

Leverage Canadian Film Connections

Though he reviews global cinema, Howell frequently spotlights Canadian talent. Projects with ties to TIFF, Canadian directors, or domestic funding models align with his advocacy for local industry growth.

Explore Sociopolitical Subtexts

His review of Mohammad Rasoulof’s The Seed of the Sacred Fig demonstrates interest in films addressing censorship or activism. Pitches should emphasize how a film reflects or challenges current societal issues.

Awards and Achievements

“Howell’s reviews are masterclasses in balancing accessibility with intellectual rigor.” — Critics Choice Association

• Critics Choice Association Membership: Recognizes his consistent editorial excellence and influence on North American film discourse.
• Toronto Film Critics Association Presidency: Led initiatives to promote emerging critics, reflecting his commitment to industry mentorship.

Pitching Tips

• Avoid franchise-driven narratives: Howell rarely covers superhero sequels or established IP.
• Highlight festival participation: TIFF, Cannes, or Sundance premieres increase pitch relevance.
• Provide access to directors: He values firsthand insights into creative processes.