Katherine Faulders
Katherine Faulders covers the fault line where politics, law and power meet, focusing on how federal investigators, prosecutors and courts respond to conduct by national political figures. At ABC News she concentrates on justice-system storylines inside the broader politics beat, turning opaque investigative steps and legal filings into fast, sourced updates that drive the network’s coverage.
Federal investigations into political figures
Faulders’ reporting centers on the Justice Department, federal prosecutors and other investigative bodies examining alleged abuses of power by prominent political actors. In coverage of matters such as the criminal probe into E. Jean Carroll’s allegations, she advances stories that hinge on confidential briefings, internal deliberations and the sequencing of investigative steps, then translates that information into clear, legally grounded copy. Her pieces typically spell out what new actions by investigators mean in practical terms — for example, the significance of a subpoena, a grand jury session or a shift in prosecutorial posture — rather than treating them as abstract procedural moves. She returns repeatedly to the theme of accountability, tracking how institutions respond when allegations touch people at the highest levels of government.
Within this space she often reports developments before they surface in public filings, relying on sources connected to law enforcement, legal teams and key witnesses. Her stories highlight the tension between the secrecy of active investigations and the public’s need to understand what is driving major political and legal confrontations. She regularly anchors her coverage in documents and on‑the‑record material where available, pairing them with sourced detail that explains why a development matters beyond the day’s headline.
Trump-era politics, Congress and the rule of law
Faulders has built a sustained body of work around Donald Trump’s political career and its legal aftermath, following investigations, lawsuits and congressional inquiries tied to his campaigns, his time in office and his post‑presidency. Rather than tracking campaign strategy or polling as a primary frame, she focuses on the legal and institutional consequences of actions by Trump and his allies, including probes related to elections, classified documents, Jan. 6 and other alleged misconduct. Her stories often sit at the intersection of branches of government, showing how the executive, Congress and the courts push and pull against each other when political conduct becomes a legal question.
Congressional oversight and investigative committees are a recurring backdrop in her work. She covers subpoenas, closed‑door interviews, contempt fights and public hearings with an eye on how they feed into or complicate parallel criminal and civil cases. In this sub‑beat she tends to foreground process and power: who controls information, which committees or chairs are driving an inquiry, what leverage they have, and how their moves reshape the options available to prosecutors, the White House or campaign operations.
Breaking news, exclusive sourcing and on‑air analysis
Faulders operates as a breaking‑news reporter on complex legal stories, frequently fronting coverage when an investigation reaches a new phase or when a high‑profile figure faces fresh legal jeopardy. Her signature headlines lean on phrases like “sources say” or “according to sources familiar with the matter,” signaling that she is drawing on people inside investigations or close to the principals to move the story forward in real time. She is adept at turning incremental developments — a new filing, a cooperation agreement, a sealed order that becomes public — into clear narratives about what might happen next procedurally.
On television she extends those skills into live segments, walking viewers through what is confirmed, what remains unknown and how current developments fit into the broader arc of an investigation or political crisis. Her on‑air role emphasizes explanation over opinion: she breaks down timelines, legal terms, and next steps in court or in Congress, often in concise hits pegged to emerging news. Across platforms she maintains a consistent emphasis on attribution and precision, making clear when information comes from documents, public statements or unnamed sources, and keeping speculation out of her scripted reporting.
Formats, collaborators and reporting style
Faulders works across formats, filing short digital stories on urgent developments, longer enterprise pieces that synthesize weeks or months of investigative activity, and recurring updates that track a case from initial allegation through charging decisions and beyond. Many of her bylines are collaborative, appearing alongside colleagues on the legal and investigative teams and with producers who share her focus on federal law enforcement and political accountability. Those collaborations allow her to pair deep sourcing on the politics side with detailed understanding of criminal procedure and civil litigation.
Her writing style is direct and restrained, with a focus on what can be documented or confirmed and how each new fact shifts the stakes for the political figures involved. She tends to minimize color and anecdote in favor of timelines, source‑driven detail and specific descriptions of official actions — a tone that reflects her anchoring in investigative work rather than campaign trail coverage. For story subjects, that means she is most engaged when there is a live legal or institutional dimension to a political narrative, and when her sourcing can shed light on decisions being made inside agencies, courtrooms and closed‑door political circles.
4 more politics journalists.
Adam Daly
Adam Daly covers politics for amNewYork with a focus on the inner workings of city and state government and the low-profile forums where power is exercised and negotiated. He reports on commissions and panels that shape how New York is governed, treating charter reform and government efficiency as central political terrain. His coverage of moves to replace an Adams-era charter commission with a new government efficiency panel foregrounds mandate, authority, and what “efficiency” means in practice for agencies and services. He tracks who gains and loses influence when one commission supplants another and which constituencies are being answered to. Daly explains dense procedural questions in clear, reader-facing terms, using specific institutional details and occasional wordplay to connect jargon-heavy reforms to public spending, service delivery, and mayoral power.
Alex Swoyer
Alex Swoyer covers national politics through the lens of the law, treating court cases and filings as core political documents rather than a separate legal niche. She reports for the Washington Times on the Supreme Court, federal courts and the justice system’s intersection with campaigns, Congress and the presidency. Her coverage follows political disputes as they move into courtrooms, focusing on cases that affect elections, executive power, immigration, religious liberty and gun rights. She explains opinions, dissents and procedural moves in plain language, grounding stories in briefs, oral arguments, orders and government records, then pairing them with reaction from officials, strategists and advocacy groups. She also reports on election rules, January 6 prosecutions, politically sensitive investigations, Republican Party dynamics and campaign‑trail narratives, using straight news, explainers and roundups to show how law, institutions and political ambition meet.
Alexander Mallin
Alexander Mallin stands out for turning dense Justice Department and federal court actions into clear, step-by-step reporting for ABC News. He covers politics through law enforcement and the courts, with a core beat on special counsel investigations, federal prosecutions, and clashes between the executive branch, Congress, and federal prosecutors. His reporting tracks interview transcripts, subpoena fights, indictments, plea deals, trial outcomes, and other court filings, especially in cases tied to President Joe Biden, the January 6 attack on the Capitol, and other high-profile political conflicts. He also covers transparency fights over investigative records and explains the statutes, rules, and institutional mechanics behind grand juries, redactions, and special counsel appointments. His stories are document-heavy, restrained, and focused on what prosecutors, defense lawyers, and judges are doing on the record.
Allie Kelly
Allie Kelly is a politics reporter at Business Insider who treats US politics as a story about personalities, performance, and the internet. She covers the intersection of political figures, online culture, and how power is exercised in public. Her work follows elected officials and rising players across parties, focusing on how they brand themselves, test messages, and respond to scrutiny. She often writes about memes, viral moments, and tools like meme coins as real campaign tactics and communication strategies. Her reporting explains how digital culture shapes electoral politics, party tensions, and governance. She favors short, accessible pieces built around vivid examples, like a lawmaker launching a DOGE-style coin, to explain broader trends. She uses clear, plain language, grounding each story in who holds power, what they are doing, and why their online choices matter.