Joseph Stepansky
Joseph Stepansky examines how US political power is exercised at home and abroad, with a particular focus on the gap between official rhetoric and the concrete policies that affect people on the ground. He covers politics for Al Jazeera English, often at the intersection of foreign policy, armed conflict and civil liberties. His reporting blends news-driven coverage with explanatory pieces that unpack the legal and political machinery behind major decisions.
US policy on Israel, Gaza and the wider Middle East
A central thread in Stepansky’s work is close scrutiny of US policy toward Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories, especially during periods of escalation in Gaza. He returns repeatedly to the question of how Washington balances stated commitments to human rights and international law with the military, diplomatic and financial backing it provides to its allies.
In coverage of US reactions to far-right Israeli politicians and to initiatives like Gaza flotillas, he dissects how condemnations, sanctions and public statements align - or fail to align - with broader strategic support.
His stories track the full policy pipeline: weapons transfers and military aid packages, United Nations votes, ceasefire diplomacy, sanctions regimes and domestic political pressure on the White House and Congress. He often zooms out from a single development to show how it fits into a longer arc of US involvement in the region, including decades-old legal frameworks and recurring debates inside both major US parties.
Interviews with legal scholars, policy analysts and rights advocates are used to test official claims and highlight the implications of US decisions for civilians in conflict zones.
Stepansky also pays close attention to how narratives around “security”, “terrorism” and “stability” are deployed in US discussions of the Middle East. His pieces examine how these narratives shape which actors are sanctioned, which are engaged diplomatically and which are shielded from meaningful censure.
The result is coverage that is less about episodic flare-ups and more about the consistent patterns of US power in the region.
Sanctions, security and the politics of designation
Beyond the Middle East, Stepansky frequently covers the use of sanctions and other coercive tools as instruments of US foreign and domestic policy.
He breaks down how individuals and groups come to be designated, what legal authorities underpin those designations and what practical effects follow for those targeted. His reporting often highlights the asymmetry between how the US treats state actors, non-state groups and activists, especially when they are linked to contentious causes abroad.
He is particularly interested in the political calculations behind sanctions decisions: which cases are pursued aggressively, which are handled quietly and which are ignored altogether. Stories in this area often explore the interplay between Congress, the executive branch and lobbying or advocacy groups that seek to shape US posture. By following specific sanctions cases over time, he shows how labels such as “terrorist” or “extremist” can migrate from legal documents into public discourse, and how that shift influences policy and public opinion.
Stepansky’s approach in this space is procedural as much as it is political.
He explains the mechanics of lists, designations and enforcement, and uses case studies to show how these tools affect travel, fundraising, speech and association. This focus makes his coverage useful for readers trying to understand not just what the US government says it is doing, but the often opaque processes that turn political priorities into binding measures.
US politics, civil liberties and dissent
Within domestic politics, Stepansky concentrates on moments where state power collides with protest, dissent and civil rights. He covers legislative and executive efforts that touch on free expression, surveillance, policing and the criminalisation of certain forms of activism, especially when they relate back to foreign policy debates.
His reporting often follows how international crises reverberate inside the US, from campus protests and street demonstrations to courtroom battles and policy fights.
He tracks how security language is used to justify restrictions on protest or to frame particular movements as threats, and he gives space to civil liberties organisations, community leaders and affected individuals to describe the on-the-ground impact of these policies. Court decisions, law-enforcement guidance and administrative rules feature prominently in these stories, reflecting his interest in the techniques through which the state manages dissent.
The emphasis is on showing how seemingly technical changes in rules and enforcement shape the room available for political organising.
Stepansky’s political coverage also follows intra-party debates and electoral calculations where they intersect with rights issues. He pays attention to how lawmakers position themselves on questions such as surveillance powers, protest crackdowns and foreign-policy votes, and how those positions are received by constituencies and advocacy groups.
His work in this area is less about campaign trail color and more about the substantive choices officials make once in office.
Explanatory reporting and expert-driven analysis
Across beats, Stepansky relies heavily on explanatory formats that combine breaking developments with deeper context.
He writes Q&As, backgrounders and analytical pieces that are structured to answer the immediate “what happened” while also addressing “how did we get here” and “what happens next”. Legal texts, policy documents and historical precedents are frequently unpacked in plain language, with a focus on the consequences for those most affected by decisions made in Washington.
He regularly anchors stories in voices from outside government - rights advocates, scholars, lawyers, community organisers and people directly impacted by conflict or policy changes. Rather than presenting official statements as the final word, he sets them alongside critical perspectives and factual records to test their accuracy and completeness.
This method gives his work a clear accountability edge: institutions are covered not only through what they announce but through how their actions are experienced.
Stylistically, Stepansky’s writing is precise and restrained, with little flourish and a steady reliance on documented facts and sourced analysis.
He is drawn to complex, often controversial subjects that require careful explanation but have immediate stakes for public understanding and democratic oversight. That combination of beat focus and explanatory rigor defines how he covers politics for the masthead.
4 more politics journalists.
A.D. Quig
A.D. Quig follows money and power through Chicago and Cook County government, showing how political decisions, taxes and public spending affect residents and businesses. At the Chicago Tribune, she covers city and county politics, municipal finance, tax policy, budgets and the structures shaping mayoral and council authority. She joined the Tribune in 2022 after covering politics for Crain’s Chicago Business and The Daily Line. Her work examines council power, ethics rules, police leadership, tax incentives, public agencies and pandemic aid. She has reported on data center tax breaks, property tax errors, federal relief spending and the fiscal effects of major development proposals. Quig combines insider government reporting with public accountability journalism. She uses public records, data and budget documents, follows committees and staff negotiations, and explains complex decisions in plain language with precise numbers and a direct link to everyday consequences.
Adam Daly
Adam Daly covers politics for amNewYork with a focus on the inner workings of city and state government and the low-profile forums where power is exercised and negotiated. He reports on commissions and panels that shape how New York is governed, treating charter reform and government efficiency as central political terrain. His coverage of moves to replace an Adams-era charter commission with a new government efficiency panel foregrounds mandate, authority, and what “efficiency” means in practice for agencies and services. He tracks who gains and loses influence when one commission supplants another and which constituencies are being answered to. Daly explains dense procedural questions in clear, reader-facing terms, using specific institutional details and occasional wordplay to connect jargon-heavy reforms to public spending, service delivery, and mayoral power.
Adam Pack
Adam Pack covers Capitol Hill through power struggles, investigations and ideological fights, focusing on how Congress intersects with Donald Trump’s agenda. He is a politics writer on Fox News Digital’s Capitol Hill team, covering Congress, federal elections, legislative battles, election rules, war powers, primaries and intraparty fights. He previously wrote for the Daily Caller News Foundation. His reporting examines deadlines, vote counts, bill language, campaign spending, court rulings, oversight reports, culture clashes and emerging issues such as AI-backed political groups. He has covered FISA reauthorization, defense spending, the SAVE America Act, housing policy, redistricting, candidate absences, primary spending and disputes over sex, gender, religion and race-based caucuses. He reports primarily through news features and investigative-style pieces built around documents, committee reports, court records, unearthed video and specific legislative details. He often co-writes complex Capitol Hill stories and publishes “FIRST ON FOX” exclusives.
Adam Sullivan
Adam Sullivan is a veteran politics reporter for WCAX who connects elections and party disputes to everyday life. He covers statewide races, party primaries, federal representation, political rhetoric, extremism, and accountability across the Upper Valley and neighboring states. His reporting includes Becca Balint’s victory over Molly Gray in the Democratic U.S. House primary to replace Congressman Peter Welch. He also reports when political controversies affect public safety, political culture, towns, and institutions, including a New Hampshire Libertarian Party post endorsing violence against elected Democrats. Sullivan follows cultural stories with civic consequences, such as Noah Kahan’s appeal to fans to stop stealing a Strafford road sign linked to his music. He writes straight news centered on concrete events, official reactions, political context, community impact, and what comes next.