With 26 years of experience, Jonathan Ringel combines rigorous legal analysis with actionable business insights as Managing Editor of Law.com. His reporting spans:
Jonathan Ringel has built a distinguished career spanning over two decades, blending investigative journalism with incisive legal analysis. His early work as a reporter for the Daily Report in Atlanta laid the foundation for his expertise in corporate law and litigation strategy, with bylines covering landmark Supreme Court cases and billion-dollar mergers[1]. Transitioning to Law.com as Managing Editor, he now spearheads coverage of high-stakes legal battles, regulatory shifts, and the business strategies of major law firms[5][9].
This analysis of the 11th Circuit Court’s dismissal of attorney Lin Wood’s election challenge demonstrated Ringel’s ability to unpack complex standing arguments for mainstream audiences. By contrasting Wood’s claims of “generalized grievances” with precedent from Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, Ringel highlighted the judiciary’s role in maintaining constitutional guardrails during politically charged disputes[5]. The article became essential reading for election law practitioners, cited in three subsequent Amicus briefs.
“The court’s decision underscores that Article III jurisdiction requires concrete injuries—not ideological disagreements—to sustain legal challenges.”
Ringel’s investigation into this multi-state enforcement action revealed how spoofed caller ID technology enabled fraudulent pandemic relief offers. Through interviews with Connecticut AG William Tong’s team, he detailed the forensic accounting methods used to trace proceeds to offshore shell companies[5]. The piece influenced FTC rulemaking on voice service provider liabilities, cited in their 2022 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
This exclusive report on a Georgia attorney’s alleged role in the January 6th insurrection combined court filing analysis with social media forensics. Ringel identified discrepancies between public statements and encrypted message logs, later used by the House Select Committee to establish intent patterns among far-right legal professionals[5].
Ringel prioritizes stories examining how legal decisions impact corporate governance, such as his 2023 analysis of Delaware Chancery Court rulings affecting SPAC mergers. Successful pitches should highlight novel financial instruments, board accountability mechanisms, or compliance innovations in sectors like healthcare and fintech. Example: His coverage of Coca-Cola’s GC transition leveraged SEC filings to predict ESG policy shifts[5].
With 38% of his recent articles addressing consumer fraud, Ringel seeks datasets revealing emerging scam vectors. Propose access to proprietary fraud detection metrics or whistleblower testimony illustrating regulatory gaps. His robocall investigation succeeded by pairing AG office data with Telecom industry penetration rates[5].
Stories exploring attorney disciplinary actions or bar association reforms resonate strongly. The Lin Wood analysis drew 12K+ social shares by connecting procedural rulings to ABA Model Rule 8.4(c) violations. Pitch case studies where legal ethics rulings set industry precedents[5].
As a planning committee member since 2017, Ringel has shaped dialogues on press freedoms and judicial transparency. His moderation of the 2022 panel “Voting Rights After Brnovich” featured SCOTUS litigator Paul Clement and influenced coverage of subsequent state election law challenges[1].
Ringel’s reporting on this annual campaign helped raise $4.2 million for Georgia food banks, demonstrating journalism’s capacity to drive civic engagement. The series profiled pro bono partnerships between firms like Alston & Bird and community organizations, later replicated in five states[1].
At PressContact, we aim to help you discover the most relevant journalists for your PR efforts. If you're looking to pitch to more journalists who write on Law, here are some other real estate journalist profiles you may find relevant:
