John H. Cochrane
John H. Cochrane writes opinion pieces on business and the economy that treat daily news as a test case for macroeconomic theory, with particular attention to central banking, financial regulation and the long-run effects of policy choices.
Central banking and the ghosts of inflation
Cochrane’s most visible work at the Washington Post centers on the politics and practice of the Federal Reserve. In his column on Kevin Warsh’s potential nomination to lead the Fed, he frames the decision as a clash between a sitting president’s preferences and the hard lessons of the late 1970s, using the “ghosts of 1979” as shorthand for the dangers of letting inflation and political pressure undermine monetary credibility. He uses that episode to show how central bankers weigh short-term growth against the risk of reigniting inflation, and how much of monetary policy is about expectations, institutional independence and the memory of past mistakes. His writing in this area distinguishes itself by treating personnel stories not as political intrigue but as windows into competing doctrines about rules versus discretion, the proper size of the Fed’s balance sheet, and how far a central bank should go in stabilizing markets.
Markets, regulation and long-term growth
Across his broader body of work in newspapers and policy outlets, Cochrane returns to the question of how regulation and taxation shape growth, innovation and financial stability. He writes frequently about banking and capital markets, arguing through concrete examples that the design of capital requirements, guarantees and crisis interventions changes how much risk the private sector is willing to bear. When he addresses reforms that follow financial crises, he focuses less on partisan framing and more on whether new rules align incentives, simplify the system and reduce the likelihood of panics. His business coverage often connects individual policy proposals—on banking, housing finance or corporate taxation—to deeper themes of productivity, investment and the conditions that allow competitive markets to function.
Academic economics in the opinion pages
Cochrane writes as an academic economist engaging with current events rather than as a traditional beat reporter, and that gives his pieces a distinctive structure and tone. He tends to build a column around a few core economic mechanisms—such as how interest rates interact with inflation expectations or how regulations alter risk-taking—and then applies them step by step to the news at hand. Instead of relying on anonymized market color, he leans on economic research, simple models and historical episodes to anchor his arguments. His style privileges explicit assumptions, logical chains and clear definitions, aiming to show readers not only what he concludes about a policy choice but how an economist would reason their way there.
Opinionated, consequence-focused analysis
Because his work is squarely in the opinion genre, Cochrane is more explicit than a straight news reporter about the trade-offs he sees in economic policy. He often stresses the long-term consequences of choices that can look attractive in the short run—whether that is political pressure on interest rates, expansive guarantees to financial institutions or rising public debt. Rather than cataloguing business headlines, he uses them as entry points to probe whether policy is encouraging sustainable growth, distorting prices, or setting up the next round of instability. The result is coverage that is less about incremental market moves and more about the underlying economic architecture that, in his view, ultimately determines prosperity and crisis.
4 more business journalists.
Alex Bronzini-Vender
Alex Bronzini-Vender is a business reporter who focuses on how economic forces and corporate decisions shape specific communities and industries. He covers business for the Washington Monthly, writing reported pieces at the intersection of commerce and public life. His work reflects the magazine’s emphasis on linking markets and money to power, policy, and everyday experience. He treats business not as balance sheets and deals but as choices that affect local realities. In “Fear and Loathing in Palo Alto,” he uses a city tied to the tech sector to examine how a powerful industry influences a community. He grounds his business beat in on-the-ground consequences rather than treating corporate and financial developments in isolation.
Alex Smith
Alex Smith focuses on the business impact of enterprise technology, with a distinctive emphasis on AI literacy and skills rather than technical specifications. They write for Technology Record, covering how artificial intelligence and cloud platforms from major providers are turned into concrete programmes for organisations and governments. Their beat sits at the junction of business strategy, national digital policy and large-scale technology partnerships. They report on national AI literacy programmes and public–private partnerships, showing how policy choices, vendor capabilities and skills gaps intersect. On the business beat, they treat AI and cloud as tools for competitiveness, workforce readiness and participation in a data-driven economy. Their concise, announcement-led reporting highlights who is partnering with whom, what programme is being launched, which technologies underpin it and how it changes capability on the ground for executive readers.
Alison Durkee
Alison Durkee focuses on how law, regulation and politics create business risks for major companies and industries. She is a reporter at Forbes, where she writes news-driven explainers on complex legal and regulatory developments and their impact on corporate strategy, reputation and markets. Her coverage centers on companies under scrutiny, especially in technology and other high-growth sectors, and tracks trials, investigations and fast-changing policy fights. She breaks down lawsuits, inquiries and regulatory moves into clear parts, grounded in timelines, filings and official actions. She reports on generative artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies as tests of legal frameworks and corporate risk management, explaining how issues like intellectual property, safety compliance, consumer protection and governance can reshape product roadmaps, partnerships and investor expectations.
Alyson Shontell
Alyson Shontell covers business through the lens of leadership, using in-depth conversations with powerful executives and founders to show how their decisions shape companies, markets, and public life. She is editor in chief at Fortune, overseeing coverage across the masthead while continuing to write selected high-impact pieces. Her core work is long, reported interviews and profiles of CEOs of large companies, dominant tech firms, and fast-growing startups. She focuses on how leaders think, manage risk, make unconventional calls, and handle crises, culture, and the future of work. Her subjects include corporate chiefs, startup founders, and political figures treated as executives. She probes operating detail, governance, internal culture, and trade-offs around growth, disruption, and workplace models, using concrete examples and direct, accessible prose that foregrounds the subject’s voice while pressing for specifics.