Jed Meshew
Jed Meshew covers mixed martial arts for MMA Fighting with a focus on opinion-driven analysis, fan-facing columns, and recurring series that explore the sport’s quirks, history, and high-stakes debates. He writes less like a wire reporter and more like a columnist who uses rankings arguments, betting breakdowns, and hypothetical matchups to make sense of where the sport is heading. His work stands out for its conversational tone, willingness to argue with consensus, and consistent effort to translate hardcore-fan conversations into structured, readable pieces.
Fan questions, hypotheticals, and argument as a format
Meshew’s regular mailbag columns frame coverage around questions fans actually ask, using single prompts as a hook for bigger-picture analysis.
In pieces like his mailbag on how Ronda Rousey would fare in the current UFC landscape, he uses a speculative premise to examine how divisions evolve, how skills age, and how narratives around stars are built and revised over time. Across his recent work he returns to similar what-if structures - how certain champions stack up historically, who deserves title shots next, what a controversial result means for a fighter’s long-term standing - which lets him fold history, matchmaking, and legacy talk into one format.
He often writes around tentpole UFC events and major cards, using columns and Q&As to sift through immediate reactions, controversial scorecards, and matchmaking fallout instead of filing straight recaps.
That approach makes his pieces read like an informed extension of fight-week and post-fight debates, with clear positions on issues such as judging criteria, divisional logjams, and whether a performance truly changes a fighter’s trajectory. He treats rankings and pound-for-pound lists as live arguments rather than static tables, and much of his coverage is driven by that urge to re-order the sport after each big weekend.
Betting, odds, and the risk–reward side of MMA
Meshew is one of MMA Fighting’s main voices on gambling and picks, building out content for readers who follow the sport through betting lines as much as through titles and rankings. In his fight-week betting work he walks through why certain odds are mispriced, which matchups lend themselves to parlays versus prop bets, and how stylistic tendencies translate into risk. He goes beyond simple “who wins” predictions, breaking down how pace, cardio, finishing ability, and judging trends affect both straight bets and over/under markets.
Those betting-focused pieces maintain the same argumentative style as his mailbags and columns. He is explicit about the logic behind each pick, ready to push back on hype if he thinks a favorite is overvalued or a veteran is being written off too soon. He often uses betting discussion as another way to talk about fighter development and matchup dynamics, highlighting when a prospect’s résumé is thin, when a veteran’s durability is starting to matter, or when small cage versus big cage details could swing a close fight.
For readers, that makes his gambling coverage double as a scouting report on cards that might otherwise be overlooked.
Series work and an eye for MMA’s margins
Alongside event-driven pieces, Meshew anchors several recurring series that give his byline a distinct shape on the site. In retrospective projects such as “DAMN! They Were Good,” he revisits the careers of notable fighters with a mix of nostalgia and critical distance, using long-form essays and roundtable-style discussions to reassess what made them special and how their legacies aged.
Those features tend to weave in context from multiple eras and promotions, and they show a strong interest in the emotional memory of big fights as much as their technical details.
He also shines a regular spotlight on the sport’s outer edges through clip-heavy features that surface unusual knockouts, regional-show chaos, and viral moments from outside the major promotions.
In that work he treats small-arena finishes and strange rules quirks as part of MMA’s texture, not just throwaway novelty. The result is a portfolio that covers everything from the top of UFC title pictures to the oddities on obscure cards, with an underlying sense that the sport is bigger and weirder than just numbered pay-per-views.
Voice, collaborations, and coverage style
Meshew’s voice is highly conversational, built on strong, clearly stated opinions, quick humor, and a willingness to lean into disagreements with colleagues and readers.
He frequently appears in collaborative formats - podcasts, rankings shows, and panel discussions - where he defends his ballots, argues for or against matchmaking ideas, and breaks down major storylines with other MMA Fighting staffers. Those appearances reinforce the tone of his written work: he treats MMA as a living argument about who is good, what matters, and how greatness is defined.
Across formats, he gravitates toward stories where there is something to debate: disputed scorecards, controversial stoppages, legacy fights, crossover events, and title pictures in flux. He is less focused on transactional news and more on the interpretation layer that follows it. For sources and subjects, that means he is most engaged when there is room to discuss stakes, styles, and narratives - why a matchup is compelling, what a result means for history, or how a fighter’s choices outside the cage shape their in-cage future.
His coverage gives readers clear takeaways about where fighters stand in the broader picture of the sport, even when the answers are uncomfortable.
4 more sports journalists.
Adair Reid
Adair Reid is a sports columnist for The Cavalier Daily who covers Virginia men’s programs with a blunt, fan-aware voice that treats them as long-term projects rather than one-off games. He focuses on trajectory, legacy and risk, using opinion columns to question coaching decisions and program strategy while grounding his arguments in recent results, records, tournament performance and roster realities. Men’s lacrosse is a recurring subject, and his work on the program’s coaching change shows how he uses a single decision to examine overall health, standards and competitive standing. He frames games in terms of stakes, identity and institutional expectations, emphasizing postseason implications, recruiting, national perception and alignment with a championship standard. He writes mostly in the first person only when needed, keeps the spotlight on institutional choices and brings analysis-first, evidence-based judgment to Virginia’s flagship men’s teams.
Adam Stern
Adam Stern covers the business of motorsports and combat sports at Sports Business Journal, focusing on how sponsorships, media deals and new events reshape racing and fighting. His beat includes NASCAR, IndyCar, Formula 1, NHRA, rallycross, UFC and boxing. He tracks brands, broadcasters, manufacturers, promoters and streaming platforms, with reporting on sponsorship strategy, rights deals, original content, series growth, team projects and technical regulations. He examines how Cadillac’s Formula 1 entry supports broader marketing aims, how F1 Academy builds commercial momentum and whether new MMA promotions can challenge UFC. His work includes short speed reads on deals and longer features on multi-party investments. He reports on the money and strategy behind the action, treating motorsports and combat sports as connected marketplaces shaped by branding, dealmaking and media innovation.
Albert Burneko
Albert Burneko writes about how systems of power bear down on ordinary people, using sports, politics, technology, food, and domestic life as entry points. He is an assignment editor and writer at Defector and part of its founding ownership group. His politics and capital reporting examines how policy, policing, and public rhetoric turn into harm for specific people, centering victims and vulnerable people. He also covers artificial intelligence, media criticism, and technology’s effects, asking who benefits and who absorbs the costs. His domestic writing focuses on parenting, bodily discomfort, and everyday frustration. His recurring Chefector column turns cooking failures into comic studies of impatience, ego, and routine. He writes sharp reported essays, first-person dispatches, mock explainers, and sports-adjacent guides. His work combines moral seriousness, comic voice, close attention to ordinary life, and a focus on how people live under larger systems.
Albert Samaha
Albert Samaha is a sports investigative reporter who uses games to examine how power, money and culture shape players, workers, fans and communities. He works in The Washington Post sports section, covering global tournaments, migration, fan culture, sports betting, match-fixing, ownership, NIL money, football safety, participation gaps and the changing culture of women’s basketball. His reporting connects events on the field to decisions in boardrooms, betting markets, government offices and law enforcement. He previously reported for BuzzFeed News and wrote for the Village Voice, San Francisco Weekly and the Riverfront Times. His work has also appeared in The New Yorker, Rolling Stone, The New York Times and The Paris Review. He writes long, deeply reported stories that combine narrative scenes, data analysis, public records, medical records and other documents.