Holmes Lybrand
Holmes Lybrand covers the collision of politics, law and truth, focusing on fact-checking high-impact claims and explaining federal cases that carry political consequences. He works on stories where partisan narratives are strongest, testing them against documents, data and the public record. His reporting is built around clear, sourced corrections and accessible explanations rather than commentary.
Fact-checking national politics and campaigns
Lybrand concentrates much of his work on scrutinising what elected officials and candidates say about core political issues.
He regularly dissects claims from presidents, presidential hopefuls, members of Congress and party figures on topics such as elections, immigration, the economy and foreign policy. His pieces break down specific assertions, lay out what records and expert analyses show, and then state plainly what is accurate, misleading or false.
He often works on fact checks pegged to key political moments, including major speeches, campaign events and congressional hearings. In those pieces, he tracks how talking points evolve, highlights when familiar falsehoods resurface and notes when new evidence undercuts prior claims.
The format is straightforward: isolate the quote, present the context and evidence, and walk the reader through how he reaches his conclusion.
Across this coverage, Lybrand treats fact-checking as a form of accountability reporting. Instead of focusing on rhetorical flourish or political strategy, he centres the public record and the practical implications of getting the facts wrong. He gives space to nuance when a claim mixes truth with exaggeration, and he is explicit when a statement lacks important context that would change how it is understood.
Federal investigations, intelligence cases and the courts
Alongside campaign and policy claims, Lybrand reports on federal investigations and prosecutions that intersect with politics and national security. His coverage of the arrest of a former CIA officer after agents seized millions of dollars’ worth of gold bars from his home is characteristic: he builds the narrative from charging documents, search warrant affidavits and official statements, then explains in plain language what the government alleges and why it matters. He pays close attention to how these cases arise from work inside US institutions and how they are handled in court.
In stories like these, he guides readers through complex legal filings, including indictments, plea agreements and sentencing memos, extracting the timelines, key transactions and communications that clarify the stakes. He explains the statutes at issue without legal jargon, connecting technical offenses to recognisable conduct. When cases touch on intelligence work, classified information or foreign contacts, he focuses on what is on the record while signalling where details remain sealed or undisclosed.
Lybrand also uses his legal-coverage frame in politically charged investigations involving current or former officeholders and their associates. He traces how allegations move from public claims or leaks into formal investigations, and then into courtroom proceedings, keeping the emphasis on verifiable facts rather than spin from either side.
Extremism, misinformation and January 6
A recurring thread in Lybrand’s work is the afterlife of the 2020 election and the January 6 attack, including the false narratives that grew out of it.
He has reported on court cases against rioters and figures linked to extremist groups, drawing from trial testimony and evidence exhibits to show what defendants did, what prosecutors could prove and how judges responded. Those stories often sit at the edge of politics and security, detailing how fringe actors interact with mainstream political movements.
He also covers conspiracy theories and misinformation that circulate around these events and other political flashpoints.
His fact checks map specific false claims to their origins, show how they have been amplified by public figures or partisan media and document what official records, data or independent investigations reveal instead. In doing so, he not only labels a claim as false but also explains the mechanics of how it spread and why it resonates with certain audiences.
Across his extremism and misinformation coverage, Lybrand pays attention to language and sourcing, favouring original documents, sworn testimony and on-the-record statements over anonymous speculation. He connects individual falsehoods back to broader narratives about election legitimacy, government overreach or political persecution, making clear how isolated claims fit into a larger ecosystem of misinformation.
Reporting style and format
Lybrand writes in a document-driven, explanatory style that prioritises precision over flourish.
His stories rely heavily on primary materials - court filings, government reports, transcripts, data sets - and he is explicit about what those materials show and what they do not. He uses short, direct sentences, with a clear structure that separates the claim, the evidence and the verdict.
He frequently shares bylines with other reporters on complex projects, particularly large-scale fact checks of major political events or sprawling legal cases. In those collaborations, his contribution reflects the same approach: close reading of documents, careful parsing of language used by officials and methodical reconstruction of timelines.
The result is coverage that is most distinctive when a story sits at the junction of politics, legal process and contested truth, and when the audience needs a clear account anchored in the record rather than in partisan narratives.
4 more politics journalists.
A.D. Quig
A.D. Quig follows money and power through Chicago and Cook County government, showing how political decisions, taxes and public spending affect residents and businesses. At the Chicago Tribune, she covers city and county politics, municipal finance, tax policy, budgets and the structures shaping mayoral and council authority. She joined the Tribune in 2022 after covering politics for Crain’s Chicago Business and The Daily Line. Her work examines council power, ethics rules, police leadership, tax incentives, public agencies and pandemic aid. She has reported on data center tax breaks, property tax errors, federal relief spending and the fiscal effects of major development proposals. Quig combines insider government reporting with public accountability journalism. She uses public records, data and budget documents, follows committees and staff negotiations, and explains complex decisions in plain language with precise numbers and a direct link to everyday consequences.
Adam Daly
Adam Daly covers politics for amNewYork with a focus on the inner workings of city and state government and the low-profile forums where power is exercised and negotiated. He reports on commissions and panels that shape how New York is governed, treating charter reform and government efficiency as central political terrain. His coverage of moves to replace an Adams-era charter commission with a new government efficiency panel foregrounds mandate, authority, and what “efficiency” means in practice for agencies and services. He tracks who gains and loses influence when one commission supplants another and which constituencies are being answered to. Daly explains dense procedural questions in clear, reader-facing terms, using specific institutional details and occasional wordplay to connect jargon-heavy reforms to public spending, service delivery, and mayoral power.
Adam Pack
Adam Pack covers Capitol Hill through power struggles, investigations and ideological fights, focusing on how Congress intersects with Donald Trump’s agenda. He is a politics writer on Fox News Digital’s Capitol Hill team, covering Congress, federal elections, legislative battles, election rules, war powers, primaries and intraparty fights. He previously wrote for the Daily Caller News Foundation. His reporting examines deadlines, vote counts, bill language, campaign spending, court rulings, oversight reports, culture clashes and emerging issues such as AI-backed political groups. He has covered FISA reauthorization, defense spending, the SAVE America Act, housing policy, redistricting, candidate absences, primary spending and disputes over sex, gender, religion and race-based caucuses. He reports primarily through news features and investigative-style pieces built around documents, committee reports, court records, unearthed video and specific legislative details. He often co-writes complex Capitol Hill stories and publishes “FIRST ON FOX” exclusives.
Adam Sullivan
Adam Sullivan is a veteran politics reporter for WCAX who connects elections and party disputes to everyday life. He covers statewide races, party primaries, federal representation, political rhetoric, extremism, and accountability across the Upper Valley and neighboring states. His reporting includes Becca Balint’s victory over Molly Gray in the Democratic U.S. House primary to replace Congressman Peter Welch. He also reports when political controversies affect public safety, political culture, towns, and institutions, including a New Hampshire Libertarian Party post endorsing violence against elected Democrats. Sullivan follows cultural stories with civic consequences, such as Noah Kahan’s appeal to fans to stop stealing a Strafford road sign linked to his music. He writes straight news centered on concrete events, official reactions, political context, community impact, and what comes next.