Hafiz Rashid
Hafiz Rashid covers the legal and procedural machinery around American politics, focusing on how courts, election officials, and government records systems constrain or enable political power. He writes for the New Republic on high-stakes disputes over transparency, voting rules, and the integrity of democratic processes, treating legal filings and administrative orders as primary documents of political life rather than background noise.
Court orders, records, and the rule of law
Rashid’s coverage centers on how judges and litigants fight over political power through paperwork, injunctions, and emergency motions. In a piece on a judge’s emergency order to stop Donald Trump from destroying records, he treats the preservation of documents as a live political battlefield rather than a technicality, explaining how a records fight can shape accountability for a former president. Across his recent work, he gravitates to cases where courts are asked to police the behavior of powerful political actors, whether through restraining orders, enforcement of subpoenas, or battles over discovery. His reporting often walks through what a ruling does in practical terms - what is blocked, what must be produced, which deadlines move - translating dense legal language into straightforward political consequences. He tends to foreground the stakes for institutional accountability and the precedent a decision might set for future conflicts over presidential power, election administration, or government secrecy.
Elections, ballot access, and democratic safeguards
A recurring thread in Rashid’s bylines is the vulnerability and resilience of U.S. election systems. He writes frequently on legal challenges to ballot access, attempts to disqualify or protect certain candidates, and fights over how votes are counted and certified. His headlines return to themes such as attempts to manipulate election rules from within state governments, disputes over who gets to administer elections, and the use of litigation as a tool to undermine or defend democratic outcomes. In these stories, he follows the chain from a legal complaint or administrative decision to its real-world impact on voters and on the mechanics of elections. Rather than treating election law as an abstract specialty, he frames it as a series of concrete interventions that can disenfranchise specific groups, entrench partisan control, or shore up protections for future contests.
Abuse of power and institutional checks
Rashid often reports on efforts to hold high-profile political figures and their allies to account through formal processes.
The Trump era and its aftermath are a constant backdrop in his work, but his interest lies less in personalities and more in the systems that either restrain or enable them. He covers investigations, ethics complaints, and oversight efforts that test the limits of executive privilege, legislative authority, and judicial oversight.
His pieces tend to connect individual skirmishes - a blocked attempt to destroy records, a challenge to an election official’s decision, a new lawsuit over political interference - to broader questions about whether existing checks on power are functioning as designed. This emphasis on institutional design and stress-testing distinguishes his coverage from more conventional political horse-race reporting.
Explanatory reporting on complex legal-politics intersections
Across his politics beat, Rashid’s stories are structured to help readers navigate complicated intersections of law and politics without assuming prior legal expertise. He writes in plain language about motions, orders, and statutory requirements while retaining the specificity of case names, jurisdictions, and procedural posture.
His articles often begin from a clear news hook - a new ruling, an emergency filing, or a shift in legal strategy - and then broaden out to show how that moment fits into a longer sequence of legal and political maneuvers. He favors reported, explanatory pieces over personality profiles or campaign-trail color, and he treats legal documents, official communications, and public records as core reporting material.
The through-line is an insistence that democracy is administered on paper and in courtrooms as much as at rallies, and that tracking those venues is essential to understanding contemporary American politics.
4 more politics journalists.
A.D. Quig
A.D. Quig follows money and power through Chicago and Cook County government, showing how political decisions, taxes and public spending affect residents and businesses. At the Chicago Tribune, she covers city and county politics, municipal finance, tax policy, budgets and the structures shaping mayoral and council authority. She joined the Tribune in 2022 after covering politics for Crain’s Chicago Business and The Daily Line. Her work examines council power, ethics rules, police leadership, tax incentives, public agencies and pandemic aid. She has reported on data center tax breaks, property tax errors, federal relief spending and the fiscal effects of major development proposals. Quig combines insider government reporting with public accountability journalism. She uses public records, data and budget documents, follows committees and staff negotiations, and explains complex decisions in plain language with precise numbers and a direct link to everyday consequences.
Adam Daly
Adam Daly covers politics for amNewYork with a focus on the inner workings of city and state government and the low-profile forums where power is exercised and negotiated. He reports on commissions and panels that shape how New York is governed, treating charter reform and government efficiency as central political terrain. His coverage of moves to replace an Adams-era charter commission with a new government efficiency panel foregrounds mandate, authority, and what “efficiency” means in practice for agencies and services. He tracks who gains and loses influence when one commission supplants another and which constituencies are being answered to. Daly explains dense procedural questions in clear, reader-facing terms, using specific institutional details and occasional wordplay to connect jargon-heavy reforms to public spending, service delivery, and mayoral power.
Adam Pack
Adam Pack covers Capitol Hill through power struggles, investigations and ideological fights, focusing on how Congress intersects with Donald Trump’s agenda. He is a politics writer on Fox News Digital’s Capitol Hill team, covering Congress, federal elections, legislative battles, election rules, war powers, primaries and intraparty fights. He previously wrote for the Daily Caller News Foundation. His reporting examines deadlines, vote counts, bill language, campaign spending, court rulings, oversight reports, culture clashes and emerging issues such as AI-backed political groups. He has covered FISA reauthorization, defense spending, the SAVE America Act, housing policy, redistricting, candidate absences, primary spending and disputes over sex, gender, religion and race-based caucuses. He reports primarily through news features and investigative-style pieces built around documents, committee reports, court records, unearthed video and specific legislative details. He often co-writes complex Capitol Hill stories and publishes “FIRST ON FOX” exclusives.
Adam Sullivan
Adam Sullivan is a veteran politics reporter for WCAX who connects elections and party disputes to everyday life. He covers statewide races, party primaries, federal representation, political rhetoric, extremism, and accountability across the Upper Valley and neighboring states. His reporting includes Becca Balint’s victory over Molly Gray in the Democratic U.S. House primary to replace Congressman Peter Welch. He also reports when political controversies affect public safety, political culture, towns, and institutions, including a New Hampshire Libertarian Party post endorsing violence against elected Democrats. Sullivan follows cultural stories with civic consequences, such as Noah Kahan’s appeal to fans to stop stealing a Strafford road sign linked to his music. He writes straight news centered on concrete events, official reactions, political context, community impact, and what comes next.