Eric Levitz
Eric Levitz writes about how economic power, public policy, and business decisions shape everyday life, focusing on the political economy behind corporate behavior and government choices. At Vox he treats business stories as questions about who benefits, who pays, and how markets and policy interact, whether he is looking at tech infrastructure like data centers or broader fights over growth, inequality, and labor.
Political economy of business and the state
Levitz’s core subject is the intersection of business, markets, and government, rather than company news in isolation. He writes extensively on how tax policy, regulation, trade rules, and social insurance affect the distribution of income and power across classes. His work often follows the money through corporate profits, wages, and public budgets to show how abstract policies translate into concrete gains and losses for different groups. He frequently examines debates within economic policy circles on issues such as inflation, fiscal stimulus, monetary policy, and antitrust, translating academic and think-tank arguments into plain language. Across these pieces he tends to foreground class conflict and bargaining power, treating business coverage as a way to explain why economic growth is shared unevenly and what tools exist to change that.
Industrial policy and local economic development
A recurring thread in Levitz’s recent coverage is the new wave of industrial policy and what it means for communities that host large projects. In writing on data centers and similar facilities, he looks past headline investment numbers to the mix of jobs, tax incentives, energy use, and land policy that determines whether a deal is genuinely good for a hometown or mostly a subsidy for already-powerful firms. He breaks down how local and state governments negotiate with large employers, what leverage they have, and how these agreements interact with national priorities on climate, infrastructure, and strategic industries. His framing is less about cheering or condemning individual projects and more about the rules of the game: how bidding wars, tax abatements, and regulatory concessions set precedents that shape future development. In this mode he often juxtaposes promised economic benefits with independent research on employment multipliers, public revenue, and longer-term community impacts.
Inequality, labor, and the distributional stakes of policy
Levitz has a long-running interest in inequality and labor, and that perspective carries into his business coverage. He writes about minimum wage policy, unions, workplace standards, and the shifting balance of power between workers and employers, treating them as central economic stories rather than niche labor issues. His pieces often track how changes in corporate strategy—such as outsourcing, automation, or consolidation—reshape job quality, worker bargaining power, and regional fortunes. He is especially attuned to how policy choices on taxation, benefits, and labor law affect not just income gaps but also economic security, mobility, and political voice for working- and middle-class people. This emphasis leads him to foreground distributional stakes in almost any business or macroeconomic story, asking not just whether the economy is growing but whom it is serving.
Analysis-driven format and evidence-heavy style
Levitz primarily writes analysis and argument pieces rather than incremental news hits or access-driven scoops. His stories tend to be essay-length, with a clear thesis, extensive context, and a through-line that carries across multiple policy areas. He draws heavily on empirical research, official data, and expert interviews, weaving in economics and political science to test conventional narratives about business and the macroeconomy. The tone is explanatory and often explicitly argumentative: he lays out competing interpretations, then makes a case for one, while still grounding his position in cited evidence and clear reasoning. He frequently revisits the same themes—such as the trade-offs of austerity versus public investment, or the long-term consequences of tax cuts and deregulation—building a cumulative argument over time rather than treating each article as a standalone take. For sources, he is more likely to quote economists, policy analysts, and data than CEOs or investor hype, and he uses charts and statistics to clarify where rhetoric diverges from measurable outcomes.
4 more business journalists.
Alex Bronzini-Vender
Alex Bronzini-Vender is a business reporter who focuses on how economic forces and corporate decisions shape specific communities and industries. He covers business for the Washington Monthly, writing reported pieces at the intersection of commerce and public life. His work reflects the magazine’s emphasis on linking markets and money to power, policy, and everyday experience. He treats business not as balance sheets and deals but as choices that affect local realities. In “Fear and Loathing in Palo Alto,” he uses a city tied to the tech sector to examine how a powerful industry influences a community. He grounds his business beat in on-the-ground consequences rather than treating corporate and financial developments in isolation.
Alex Smith
Alex Smith focuses on the business impact of enterprise technology, with a distinctive emphasis on AI literacy and skills rather than technical specifications. They write for Technology Record, covering how artificial intelligence and cloud platforms from major providers are turned into concrete programmes for organisations and governments. Their beat sits at the junction of business strategy, national digital policy and large-scale technology partnerships. They report on national AI literacy programmes and public–private partnerships, showing how policy choices, vendor capabilities and skills gaps intersect. On the business beat, they treat AI and cloud as tools for competitiveness, workforce readiness and participation in a data-driven economy. Their concise, announcement-led reporting highlights who is partnering with whom, what programme is being launched, which technologies underpin it and how it changes capability on the ground for executive readers.
Alison Durkee
Alison Durkee focuses on how law, regulation and politics create business risks for major companies and industries. She is a reporter at Forbes, where she writes news-driven explainers on complex legal and regulatory developments and their impact on corporate strategy, reputation and markets. Her coverage centers on companies under scrutiny, especially in technology and other high-growth sectors, and tracks trials, investigations and fast-changing policy fights. She breaks down lawsuits, inquiries and regulatory moves into clear parts, grounded in timelines, filings and official actions. She reports on generative artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies as tests of legal frameworks and corporate risk management, explaining how issues like intellectual property, safety compliance, consumer protection and governance can reshape product roadmaps, partnerships and investor expectations.
Alyson Shontell
Alyson Shontell covers business through the lens of leadership, using in-depth conversations with powerful executives and founders to show how their decisions shape companies, markets, and public life. She is editor in chief at Fortune, overseeing coverage across the masthead while continuing to write selected high-impact pieces. Her core work is long, reported interviews and profiles of CEOs of large companies, dominant tech firms, and fast-growing startups. She focuses on how leaders think, manage risk, make unconventional calls, and handle crises, culture, and the future of work. Her subjects include corporate chiefs, startup founders, and political figures treated as executives. She probes operating detail, governance, internal culture, and trade-offs around growth, disruption, and workplace models, using concrete examples and direct, accessible prose that foregrounds the subject’s voice while pressing for specifics.