By Katie Paul
Katie Paul covers the collision of social media, politics and business, with a particular focus on how the major platforms design, police and profit from online speech. Her reporting stands out for combining access to internal documents and insiders with close reading of public policy and legal filings, showing how content moderation, security and regulatory strategies play out inside the companies that dominate the digital public square.
Social media platforms under political and regulatory scrutiny
Paul’s core subject is the conduct of the largest social platforms, especially Meta, in moments of political, legal or regulatory pressure. She has reported on Meta’s plans for layoffs and restructuring based on internal documentation, using that access to show how cost-cutting intersects with safety, policy and enforcement teams. Across recent coverage she follows how Meta, X and other platforms respond to government demands, legislative pressures and court challenges, detailing changes in policies on misinformation, hate speech and political content.
Her stories often foreground official decisions whose implications reach beyond a single platform announcement: adjustments to election integrity rules, changes in the treatment of political advertising, and shifts in enforcement around extremist or violent content. She frequently links these decisions to investigations, lawsuits or regulatory actions, highlighting when platform policies move in anticipation of, or in reaction to, outside scrutiny. The reporting emphasises concrete consequences, such as which teams are cut or expanded, what tools are rolled back or deployed, and which kinds of speech are newly tolerated or restricted.
Content moderation, harmful speech and safety teams
A recurring thread in Paul’s work is the tension between platform growth goals and the resources devoted to safety and content moderation. She has written on internal reorganisations affecting trust and safety operations, including the effects of layoffs on teams responsible for policing harmful content in multiple languages. Her coverage tracks how moderation rules evolve around topics such as hate speech, incitement, misinformation and harassment, and how enforcement differs across regions and political contexts.
Paul frequently focuses on the mechanics of enforcement: the tools moderators use, escalation paths for high-risk material, and how automated systems and human review interact. She highlights where moderation gaps allow harmful content to persist, including in non-English markets, and where policy carve-outs or exemptions give politically powerful actors different treatment from ordinary users. When platforms test or deploy new moderation approaches, she reports on both the internal rationale and the external impact on users exposed to abusive or misleading content.
Corporate strategy, restructuring and internal governance
Alongside policy and safety, Paul covers how social media companies reorganise themselves in response to economic pressures and strategic shifts. Her reporting on Meta’s layoff and restructuring plans uses internal planning documents to show which functions are prioritised and which are de-emphasised, and how leadership sequences job cuts, team consolidations and reporting-line changes. She connects these moves to broader strategic bets on areas such as artificial intelligence, virtual and augmented reality, and short-form video.
She also reports on internal governance: the role of executive leadership in setting rules for content, the influence of policy and public affairs teams in shaping moderation decisions, and the interplay between engineering priorities and safety obligations. Stories in this line often describe internal debates and pushback from staff affected by structural changes, offering a view of how front-line employees and managers experience top-down shifts in company direction.
Disinformation, influence campaigns and platform abuse
Another distinct strand of Paul’s work examines how states, political actors and organised networks exploit social media systems. She has reported on covert influence campaigns, coordinated inauthentic behaviour and networks spreading political propaganda or deceptive content, explaining how they are structured and how platforms detect and remove them. These pieces often include technical detail about fake account networks, cross-platform coordination and the use of advertising or recommendation systems to amplify specific narratives.
Her coverage links disinformation and abuse to real-world outcomes, such as election interference, harassment of targeted communities and the spread of conspiracy movements. When platforms announce takedowns or new security measures, Paul drills into what changed, who was affected and what vulnerabilities remain. She treats external research and civil society investigations as part of the story, showing how outside pressure and independent analysis intersect with internal enforcement actions.
Legal challenges and global implications of platform policies
Paul also reports on legal and regulatory cases that test the liability and responsibilities of social media companies. She covers lawsuits, regulatory investigations and emerging legislative frameworks that seek to define how platforms must handle harmful content, data protection and user safety. Her stories explain how these processes could reshape corporate policies, risk calculations and business models, particularly regarding algorithmic amplification and transparency requirements.
Throughout this legal and regulatory coverage, she keeps a global lens. She notes when rules crafted in one jurisdiction drive changes worldwide and when companies apply different standards across markets. This focus on cross-border implications helps situate individual cases within a larger narrative of how governments and tech companies negotiate power over online speech, safety and information flows.
4 more business journalists.
Alex Bronzini-Vender
Alex Bronzini-Vender is a business reporter who focuses on how economic forces and corporate decisions shape specific communities and industries. He covers business for the Washington Monthly, writing reported pieces at the intersection of commerce and public life. His work reflects the magazine’s emphasis on linking markets and money to power, policy, and everyday experience. He treats business not as balance sheets and deals but as choices that affect local realities. In “Fear and Loathing in Palo Alto,” he uses a city tied to the tech sector to examine how a powerful industry influences a community. He grounds his business beat in on-the-ground consequences rather than treating corporate and financial developments in isolation.
Alex Smith
Alex Smith focuses on the business impact of enterprise technology, with a distinctive emphasis on AI literacy and skills rather than technical specifications. They write for Technology Record, covering how artificial intelligence and cloud platforms from major providers are turned into concrete programmes for organisations and governments. Their beat sits at the junction of business strategy, national digital policy and large-scale technology partnerships. They report on national AI literacy programmes and public–private partnerships, showing how policy choices, vendor capabilities and skills gaps intersect. On the business beat, they treat AI and cloud as tools for competitiveness, workforce readiness and participation in a data-driven economy. Their concise, announcement-led reporting highlights who is partnering with whom, what programme is being launched, which technologies underpin it and how it changes capability on the ground for executive readers.
Alison Durkee
Alison Durkee focuses on how law, regulation and politics create business risks for major companies and industries. She is a reporter at Forbes, where she writes news-driven explainers on complex legal and regulatory developments and their impact on corporate strategy, reputation and markets. Her coverage centers on companies under scrutiny, especially in technology and other high-growth sectors, and tracks trials, investigations and fast-changing policy fights. She breaks down lawsuits, inquiries and regulatory moves into clear parts, grounded in timelines, filings and official actions. She reports on generative artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies as tests of legal frameworks and corporate risk management, explaining how issues like intellectual property, safety compliance, consumer protection and governance can reshape product roadmaps, partnerships and investor expectations.
Alyson Shontell
Alyson Shontell covers business through the lens of leadership, using in-depth conversations with powerful executives and founders to show how their decisions shape companies, markets, and public life. She is editor in chief at Fortune, overseeing coverage across the masthead while continuing to write selected high-impact pieces. Her core work is long, reported interviews and profiles of CEOs of large companies, dominant tech firms, and fast-growing startups. She focuses on how leaders think, manage risk, make unconventional calls, and handle crises, culture, and the future of work. Her subjects include corporate chiefs, startup founders, and political figures treated as executives. She probes operating detail, governance, internal culture, and trade-offs around growth, disruption, and workplace models, using concrete examples and direct, accessible prose that foregrounds the subject’s voice while pressing for specifics.