Aygün
Aygün covers how artificial intelligence is reshaping scientific work, with a particular focus on tools that help researchers design, code and validate complex software and models. Their stories track emerging AI systems from early research prototypes to practical instruments in the lab, showing what these tools can and cannot do for working scientists.
AI tools for empirical software and scientific coding
Aygün reports closely on AI systems that generate or support empirical software used in research. In the piece on an AI system that helps scientists write expert-level empirical software, they explain how the model is trained on domain-specific code and empirical workflows, what kinds of programming tasks it can handle, and how its output compares with that of experienced human coders. The reporting breaks down the difference between generic code assistants and tools tuned for scientific experimentation, highlighting the constraints of reproducible research, data handling and statistical validation. This focus on empirical software positions their coverage at the intersection of computer science and scientific methodology, rather than consumer or business technology.
Automation inside the scientific workflow
Across recent technology pieces for the masthead, Aygün returns to the theme of automation embedded in the day-to-day work of scientists: code generation for simulations, automated analysis pipelines and AI-driven helpers for writing and documenting methods. They follow individual projects from technical preprints and conference presentations through to working demonstrations, describing how researchers integrate these tools into version control, testing frameworks and lab workflows. Their coverage often dwells on edge cases and failure modes, such as when generated analysis scripts mishandle data, or when automation conflicts with existing validation practices. That emphasis gives communications teams a clear view of how a system has to perform to be taken seriously by technical users.
Limits, risks and validation of AI in research
Aygün’s technology reporting consistently balances enthusiasm for sophisticated AI systems with attention to their limitations and risks in scientific settings. They describe how teams benchmark new tools against established methods, how they measure code quality, and how they test for subtle errors that could compromise experimental results. Their stories surface concerns about over-reliance on automated coding systems, questions of accountability when software bugs affect published findings, and the need for transparent documentation of AI-generated components. This framing keeps the focus on reproducibility, error checking and peer scrutiny rather than on hype about AI replacing researchers.
Format and approach
Aygün writes explanatory news and feature pieces that translate technical AI and software research into precise, accessible language for a scientific readership. Headlines and ledes tend to be tightly framed around a single system or study, then widen out to situate it in broader trends in AI-assisted research. They quote directly from developers and users of new tools, using their accounts to illustrate both opportunity and friction in real-world deployment. The result is coverage that treats AI for science as infrastructure — code, models and workflows that must be tested, maintained and understood — rather than as abstract innovation.
4 more technology journalists.
Alex Co
Alex Co is a video game technology reporter at MP1st who specializes in live-service systems and online titles, with patch coverage as the core of his work. He tracks game updates in real time, documenting patch numbers, download sizes, platform differences, full or near-full patch notes, and the changes that affect everyday play. He also reports on server status, outages, and maintenance windows so players know if issues are local or on the developer’s end. His beat extends to console exclusives, PC ports, subscription services, and cross-platform features, with an emphasis on implementation details and player impact. He focuses heavily on multiplayer shooters and competitive balance, and also covers live-service calendars, seasonal events, and multiplayer stability, always prioritizing precise, timely, and actionable information for active players.
Alex Perry
Alex Perry stands out for turning consumer technology news into practical help for people using the hardware they already own. They cover consumer technology for the masthead, focusing on software support changes, platform policies, device updates, apps, streaming platforms, and online services. Their reporting shows what changes on screen, which settings matter, what stops working, and what workarounds remain. Perry writes in a direct, utility-first style and often treats news as a service problem to solve. They are especially attentive to aging devices, including older Kindles, and explain cutoff dates, affected models, offline use, sideloading, and account changes in plain language. Their work appears in quick news reactions, guides, and longer explainers, always aimed at readers who want clear, step-by-step answers.
Ali Hashmi
Ali Hashmi covers technology through the lens of video games, using individual titles to show how interactive systems feel and function for players. He writes for Prima Games. His work sits where game design, visual presentation, and user experience meet, with a focus on what it is like to inhabit the worlds that new releases create. He treats game criticism as a way into technology, breaking down how it appears in games instead of doing standalone hardware reviews. He looks at how technical choices support pacing, control, and readability on screen, weighing mechanics, performance, and audiovisual style together. In his “REPLACED” review, framed as “Tears in the Rain,” he shows how animation, lighting, and input responsiveness shape mood, storytelling, and immersion. Across his work, his through-line is the player’s moment-to-moment experience with the technology in front of them.
Andrew Agress
Andrew Agress stands out for covering technology through the lens of video games, with a focus on how new titles actually play rather than how they are pitched. He writes for The Outerhaven and works in a preview-driven format that foregrounds direct time with a game. His coverage of The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales shows his beat: hands-on previews of upcoming titles, with attention to combat, exploration, storytelling, pacing, controls, and presentation. He uses clear genre touchstones and straightforward comparisons, calling the game “Chrono Trigger meets classic Zelda” to place it in context. His reporting stays grounded in player experience and explains what a game feels like moment to moment, not just what features it lists.