Andrew Seidman
Andrew Seidman covers how business decisions and economic policy collide with politics and public opinion for The Philadelphia Inquirer, with a focus on making complex regulatory and market issues understandable to general readers. His reporting often uses survey data and on-the-ground interviews to show how abstract debates over technology and regulation translate into concrete consequences for workers, consumers, and businesses.
Business, policy, and public opinion
Seidman’s coverage frequently sits at the three-way intersection of business, government, and the public. In stories such as his report on a University of Pennsylvania survey finding that most Americans believe the government has not done enough to regulate artificial intelligence, he uses polling data to anchor broader questions about regulatory pace, corporate responsibility, and economic risk. He treats public opinion not as color, but as a core business variable that shapes how markets evolve and how policymakers respond.
Across his business beat, he often traces how shifts in regulation, taxation, or corporate strategy feed back into voter attitudes and household finances. Rather than isolating business from politics, he shows how corporate decisions are made within a contested public environment, bringing in voices from affected communities alongside experts. The result is coverage that helps explain why certain policy fights matter to companies and residents beyond headline numbers.
Explaining complex regulation in plain language
Seidman has a particular strength in translating technical policy and regulatory debates for readers who do not follow them closely. In his work on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, he breaks down what proposed safeguards would actually do, who would have to comply, and where enforcement gaps remain. He distills terminology from regulators, academics, and industry sources into straightforward explanations that clarify risks, incentives, and timelines.
He applies the same approach to business stories rooted in legislation, rulemaking, or government oversight. Instead of focusing solely on the partisan fight, he walks through the mechanics: how a rule would affect specific sectors, what compliance might cost, and which groups are positioned to win or lose if a measure passes or stalls. His stories tend to move from clear definitions to real-world examples, making it easier for readers to follow the implications for their own work or finances.
Data-driven reporting with concrete stakes
Quantitative evidence is a recurring feature of Seidman’s coverage. He incorporates survey results, economic indicators, and budget figures to support narrative reporting, using numbers to ground interviews with business leaders, workers, and policy experts. In the Penn survey story on AI regulation, for example, he treats the topline finding as a starting point and then probes how that sentiment aligns or conflicts with the current policy landscape and corporate practices.
His data use tends to be pragmatic rather than flashy: tables, percentages, and trend lines are there to clarify scale and direction, not to overwhelm the story. He often pairs statistics with specific case studies drawn from companies or institutions in his region, tying national trends back to local employers, industries, and consumers. This gives his business reporting a dual focus—situating the local economy inside national and global currents while still delivering granular, place-specific detail.
Voice, sourcing, and format
Seidman writes in a restrained, explanatory voice that privileges clarity over flourish. He leans on a mix of academic researchers, industry representatives, policymakers, and ordinary stakeholders, and his stories typically feature multiple perspectives rather than a single dominant narrator. He is comfortable working in both breaking-news and enterprise formats, alternating between timely coverage of developments that move markets or policy and longer pieces that unpack the context behind them.
Across his body of work, he shows a consistent interest in accountability: how well government oversight keeps pace with business innovation, what gaps remain, and who bears the cost when it does not. For communications teams, his coverage pattern indicates close attention to evidence, a preference for clearly articulated stakes, and a focus on the broader economic and political environment in which any given company or issue sits.
4 more business journalists.
Alex Bronzini-Vender
Alex Bronzini-Vender is a business reporter who focuses on how economic forces and corporate decisions shape specific communities and industries. He covers business for the Washington Monthly, writing reported pieces at the intersection of commerce and public life. His work reflects the magazine’s emphasis on linking markets and money to power, policy, and everyday experience. He treats business not as balance sheets and deals but as choices that affect local realities. In “Fear and Loathing in Palo Alto,” he uses a city tied to the tech sector to examine how a powerful industry influences a community. He grounds his business beat in on-the-ground consequences rather than treating corporate and financial developments in isolation.
Alex Smith
Alex Smith focuses on the business impact of enterprise technology, with a distinctive emphasis on AI literacy and skills rather than technical specifications. They write for Technology Record, covering how artificial intelligence and cloud platforms from major providers are turned into concrete programmes for organisations and governments. Their beat sits at the junction of business strategy, national digital policy and large-scale technology partnerships. They report on national AI literacy programmes and public–private partnerships, showing how policy choices, vendor capabilities and skills gaps intersect. On the business beat, they treat AI and cloud as tools for competitiveness, workforce readiness and participation in a data-driven economy. Their concise, announcement-led reporting highlights who is partnering with whom, what programme is being launched, which technologies underpin it and how it changes capability on the ground for executive readers.
Alison Durkee
Alison Durkee focuses on how law, regulation and politics create business risks for major companies and industries. She is a reporter at Forbes, where she writes news-driven explainers on complex legal and regulatory developments and their impact on corporate strategy, reputation and markets. Her coverage centers on companies under scrutiny, especially in technology and other high-growth sectors, and tracks trials, investigations and fast-changing policy fights. She breaks down lawsuits, inquiries and regulatory moves into clear parts, grounded in timelines, filings and official actions. She reports on generative artificial intelligence and other emerging technologies as tests of legal frameworks and corporate risk management, explaining how issues like intellectual property, safety compliance, consumer protection and governance can reshape product roadmaps, partnerships and investor expectations.
Alyson Shontell
Alyson Shontell covers business through the lens of leadership, using in-depth conversations with powerful executives and founders to show how their decisions shape companies, markets, and public life. She is editor in chief at Fortune, overseeing coverage across the masthead while continuing to write selected high-impact pieces. Her core work is long, reported interviews and profiles of CEOs of large companies, dominant tech firms, and fast-growing startups. She focuses on how leaders think, manage risk, make unconventional calls, and handle crises, culture, and the future of work. Her subjects include corporate chiefs, startup founders, and political figures treated as executives. She probes operating detail, governance, internal culture, and trade-offs around growth, disruption, and workplace models, using concrete examples and direct, accessible prose that foregrounds the subject’s voice while pressing for specifics.