Andrew Seidman
Andrew Seidman covers how business decisions and economic policy collide with politics and public opinion for The Philadelphia Inquirer, with a focus on making complex regulatory and market issues understandable to general readers. His reporting often uses survey data and on-the-ground interviews to show how abstract debates over technology and regulation translate into concrete consequences for workers, consumers, and businesses.
Business, policy, and public opinion
Seidman’s coverage frequently sits at the three-way intersection of business, government, and the public. In stories such as his report on a University of Pennsylvania survey finding that most Americans believe the government has not done enough to regulate artificial intelligence, he uses polling data to anchor broader questions about regulatory pace, corporate responsibility, and economic risk.
He treats public opinion not as color, but as a core business variable that shapes how markets evolve and how policymakers respond.
Across his business beat, he often traces how shifts in regulation, taxation, or corporate strategy feed back into voter attitudes and household finances.
Rather than isolating business from politics, he shows how corporate decisions are made within a contested public environment, bringing in voices from affected communities alongside experts. The result is coverage that helps explain why certain policy fights matter to companies and residents beyond headline numbers.
Explaining complex regulation in plain language
Seidman has a particular strength in translating technical policy and regulatory debates for readers who do not follow them closely. In his work on emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, he breaks down what proposed safeguards would actually do, who would have to comply, and where enforcement gaps remain.
He distills terminology from regulators, academics, and industry sources into straightforward explanations that clarify risks, incentives, and timelines.
He applies the same approach to business stories rooted in legislation, rulemaking, or government oversight.
Instead of focusing solely on the partisan fight, he walks through the mechanics: how a rule would affect specific sectors, what compliance might cost, and which groups are positioned to win or lose if a measure passes or stalls. His stories tend to move from clear definitions to real-world examples, making it easier for readers to follow the implications for their own work or finances.
Data-driven reporting with concrete stakes
Quantitative evidence is a recurring feature of Seidman’s coverage. He incorporates survey results, economic indicators, and budget figures to support narrative reporting, using numbers to ground interviews with business leaders, workers, and policy experts.
In the Penn survey story on AI regulation, for example, he treats the topline finding as a starting point and then probes how that sentiment aligns or conflicts with the current policy landscape and corporate practices.
His data use tends to be pragmatic rather than flashy: tables, percentages, and trend lines are there to clarify scale and direction, not to overwhelm the story. He often pairs statistics with specific case studies drawn from companies or institutions in his region, tying national trends back to local employers, industries, and consumers. This gives his business reporting a dual focus - situating the local economy inside national and global currents while still delivering granular, place-specific detail.
Voice, sourcing, and format
Seidman writes in a restrained, explanatory voice that privileges clarity over flourish. He leans on a mix of academic researchers, industry representatives, policymakers, and ordinary stakeholders, and his stories typically feature multiple perspectives rather than a single dominant narrator.
He is comfortable working in both breaking-news and enterprise formats, alternating between timely coverage of developments that move markets or policy and longer pieces that unpack the context behind them.
Across his body of work, he shows a consistent interest in accountability: how well government oversight keeps pace with business innovation, what gaps remain, and who bears the cost when it does not. For communications teams, his coverage pattern indicates close attention to evidence, a preference for clearly articulated stakes, and a focus on the broader economic and political environment in which any given company or issue sits.
4 more business journalists.
Aaron Karp
Aaron Karp is distinct for connecting airline networks, airport infrastructure, air cargo and policy. He is a senior editor at Air Transport World and has covered aviation since 1999. He has also worked as an editor for cargo-focused and daily aviation publications. His real beat is how airlines and airports respond to growth, regulation, trade conditions, sustainability pressures and technology changes. He covers route planning, network development, airport capacity, infrastructure, cargo flows, trade lanes, safety, air traffic control and future technology. He reports through news, features, opinion pieces, briefings and podcasts. He uses data, executive insight and industry conference reporting to explain market changes. His work links cargo metrics and trade policy to carrier strategy, and connects infrastructure and sustainability decisions to resilience, costs and long-term growth.
Adrienne Roberts
Adrienne Roberts is a business journalist at the Detroit Free Press who covers how policy, regulation and corporate decisions affect Michigan’s cannabis market, jobs, universities and health systems. She has a sustained focus on cannabis taxes, licensing, sales, product rules, consumer safety and local tax revenue. She also reports on unemployment, worker protections, corporate settlements, hiring, higher education, student safety, housing, data centers, health care access and economic forecasts. Roberts joined the Detroit Free Press in 2020 after covering automotive retail, dealers and labor issues for The Wall Street Journal. She explains complex business and regulatory changes with data, legal detail and on-the-ground voices. Her stories focus on practical effects for workers, students, consumers and communities, showing both the numbers and the people behind them.
Alex Bronzini-Vender
Alex Bronzini-Vender is a business reporter who focuses on how economic forces and corporate decisions shape specific communities and industries. He covers business for the Washington Monthly, writing reported pieces at the intersection of commerce and public life. His work reflects the magazine’s emphasis on linking markets and money to power, policy, and everyday experience. He treats business not as balance sheets and deals but as choices that affect local realities. In “Fear and Loathing in Palo Alto,” he uses a city tied to the tech sector to examine how a powerful industry influences a community. He grounds his business beat in on-the-ground consequences rather than treating corporate and financial developments in isolation.
Alex DeMarban
Alex DeMarban stands out for tracking major energy projects over time while showing how economic shifts affect local businesses. He reports for the Anchorage Daily News on business, oil and gas, and general assignments. His coverage focuses on Alaska LNG, long-haul energy projects, mining, ports, transportation infrastructure, and the everyday businesses that keep the state running. He examines financing, tax legislation, labor agreements, regulatory approvals, timelines and costs, and connects government and corporate decisions to workers, communities and consumers. He also reports on restaurant closures, grocery stores, breweries, meaderies, parking and trade disputes. His past coverage includes an open-pit mine near the proposed Ambler road, federal port grants and competitive elections. He reports through dollar figures, project details, public records, business owners and affected workers, showing how policy and resource development play out on the ground.